Skip to main content

The dystopian genre gets a shot in the arm


 

Blade Runner 2049

2017

Four stars

Director: Denis Villeneuve

Stars: Ryan Gosling, Harrison Ford, Jared Leto, Sylvia Hoeks, Robin Wright.

Runtime: 2hrs 44 mins

We know that dystopian cinema includes fascinating works of art. Films like “Brazil,” “A Clockwork Orange,” and “Moon” aren’t just some of the best of the genre, they are some of the best regardless. But does their premise make them fundamentally incapable of being beautiful in every sense? Can something so ostensibly bleak, dark and pessimistic also be alluring and elegant? Unequivocally, yes. And you can add “Blade Runner 2049” to the mix.

Director Denis Villeneuve takes us to Los Angeles 32 years in the future (from the release of the film). The planet is vastly overpopulated, ecosystems have collapsed, and famine is widespread until an industrialist named Niander Wallace (Jared Leto) invents synthetic farming. In the original “Blade Runner,” synthetic humans known as replicants were engineered with superior strength and exploited as slave labor. They rebelled and a division of police called Blade Runners was created to eliminate the older replicant models. Wallace has created new replicants to replace the older models; ones that are more obedient and created to work the synthetic farms he’s invented.

California is unrecognizable. Everything is tightly compacted together. There is no open green space, no sprawling parks. Buildings have no space between them and the architectural answer to such a lack of room is to build upward. There are no clear sunny skies. Every day seems to be a different shade of grey or sepia. The damage that has been done to Earth is clear.

Replicants, like a new version of a Blade Runner who goes by the moniker “K” (Ryan Gosling), are able to experience emotion, though they aren’t supposed to exhibit it. If they do, they are exterminated or “retired” as it’s referred to in the film, ostensibly to prevent any future rebellions. Any exhibition of joy, sadness, or anger is seen as a threat to the establishment.

K is sent on a particularly sensitive mission. Something impossible has happened among the replicants and it is a threat to the balance of power. He is assigned to eliminate that threat. The dichotomy here is that replicants are essentially servants. They are expected to carry out their duties flawlessly, without emotion. Yet they are capable of feeling and expressing every emotion humans can experience. K is very good at keeping his emotions in check while he is on the job. In his private life, however, K has a love interest -- an AI-generated woman named Joi (Ana de Armas). Though she has no physical form, she is intelligent and intuitive just like a human. She is a companion to K in just about every way except the corporeal. K could certainly have a relationship with an actual woman. But he is intelligent enough to keep certain boundaries in place. We sense that the calm demeanor he’s expected to display at all times would be compromised if Joi were real.

K’s investigation leads him to Deckard (Harrison Ford), who we remember from the first “Blade Runner” film in 1982. Deckard lives alone in an abandoned Las Vegas resort. He seems to hold the key to this threat replicants may soon pose and K is determined to get answers.

But Niander Wallace and his replicant assistant, Luv (Sylvia Hoeks) also have a stake in this impossible occurrence, so they follow just behind K’s investigation to see what he comes up with.

The further he delves into his investigation, we start to see cracks in K’s exterior. The case starts to erode at his stoic façade. One key scene is when K is talking to his boss, Lt. Joshi (Robin Wright). Something that is born has a soul, K says. And when Joshi tells him he’s gotten along fine without a soul, he genuinely looks hurt without being obvious. That is just how subtly good Gosling is in this role.

K is keen to others’ emotions as well. He is very observant. And Gosling’s ability to express only with his eyes is a necessary element to pulling off the subtleties to this character.

Despite its domineering gray, black and sepia tones, there is an unmistakable beauty here. But the visual aspect isn’t just window dressing. This is a complete film, one in which we are warned about a number of existential threats on the horizon: overcrowding, climate change, exhaustion of natural resources, and the overreach of technology by oligarchs. The head of an orphanage (inside a massive garbage dump, mind you) speaks of a “grand life” off world, implying that only the super wealthy can afford to live there. The children at the orphanage are also exploited for slave labor, salvaging electronics for parts used to build and maintain the ships to transport wealthy people off world.

You can’t help but marvel at how comprehensive the vision of this film is, despite its solemnity and, occasionally, its morbidity. There seems to be no stone unturned, no question unanswered. It is a remarkable visualization of something that could eventually become frighteningly real.

Replicants feel emotion. That is the crux of this film. Though they are engineered and not born, they are essentially humans without memories of growing up (those are implanted). So though this is a science-fiction film, there is an unmistakable element of Pinocchio to it. Though K has been “made” and not born, he exhibits everything that is fundamentally human. In one scene as Joi reminds K how truly special he is, she tells him he is a real boy and needs a real name.  

Besides the Pinocchio theme, the film is in part a meditation on what is a meaningful life. It echoes what Viktor Frankl wrote in his book “Man’s Search for Meaning.” Certain aspects of what humans consider meaningful are different for each person. But one commonality that gives all of us meaning, Frankl wrote, is the ability to love and to be loved: the ability to put another human being before oneself is one of the most meaningful acts we can experience.

This is a film that can’t just be classified in one genre. It is multifaceted, provocative and stunningly gorgeous. It isn’t just one of the true best of its kind, it is one of the best of any kind.

Comments

  1. Great review Michael, I can wait to see it! Would have been a surprise if Wesley would have made a cameo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why thanks Mzz.p! Give it a shot. I think you'll like it.

      Delete
  2. Karnataka PUC Solved Question Paper 2021 Mock Tests & Answers is very help full for the students to know the PUC Exam Past Year Question Paper analysis, Students can Download utilize the Previous Exam paper for the Reference for final Examination. 2nd PUC Model Paper 2022 Steady the repeated questions from kar PUC Model Question Paper 2021 Practice on those is the better way to get the good Grade, Students Download Solved Paper and Question Patterns of Karnataka II PUC Examination 2021 from the official website.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Don't Look Up -- The Wrong Guy for the Job

Don’t Look Up Two stars Director: Adam McKay Stars: Leonardo DiCaprio, Jennifer Lawrence, Meryl Streep, Jonah Hill, Rob Morgan, Mark Rylance, Timothée Chalamet, Tyler Perry, Cate Blanchett, Ariana Grande. I can’t say that I’ve been a big fan of Adam McKay. He’s made his career as a comedy writer/director/producer and worked on Saturday Night Live before making the switch to feature films. Some of his comedies are pretty good, such as “Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy,” “The Other Guys,” “Step Brothers,” and “Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby.” He seemed to carve out a nice niche for himself. But in 2015 his career took a turn and his films moved into the political sphere. First, he adapted the Michael Lewis book, “The Big Short” into a feature film. The film chronicled the events that led to the housing market crash in 2008. Then in 2018, he directed the Dich Cheney biopic “Vice,” which netted him a fair amount of critical acclaim. And now with “Don’t Look Up,”...

Could stand more "Wonder" here

  Wonder Woman 1984 Two stars Director: Patty Jenkins      Stars: Gal Gadot, Chris Pine, Pedro Pascal, Kristen Wiig, Robin Wright, Connie Nielsen Running time: 2hr 31min For a long time I have been behind giving female characters in the superhero genre of movies more of the spotlight. I have wanted to see male characters step back, relegated to second-tier status, and let their female counterparts shine. We have seen this more and more. Not only has Wonder Woman had two feature films, we have seen characters like that of Regina King in “Watchmen” take center stage and Scarlett Johansson’s Marvel character “Black Widow” will get her own film in 2021. Women are getting greater attention in this genre, as it should be. What is particularly distressing is when a script subtly, but significantly, undercuts this progress, which is the case with “Wonder Woman 1984.” It gives the impression that the wheels of equality in Hollywood are turning more slowly t...