The Adam
Project
Three stars
Director:
Shawn Levy
Stars: Ryan
Reynolds, Jennifer Garner, Walker Scobell, Mark Ruffalo, Zoe Saldana, Catherine
Keener
Ryan
Reynolds has carved out a pretty nice career for himself playing the inveterate
smart ass. That is his schtick and he’s very good at it. He first burst on the
scene with the TV series “Two Guys, a Girl and a Pizza Place” with just that
kind of character. And you have seen something similar in the “Deadpool” movies
(of which #3 is set to start production soon), “The Croods” movies and most
recently, “Red Notice,” and “Free Guy.”
His
eponymous character in “The Adam Project” isn’t much different. That is a good and
a bad thing.
Reynolds
plays Adam Reed, an ace pilot in the year 2050. As the film opens, Adam is in
his star fighter and looking to travel back in time. He apparently commandeered
his fighter and is being chased by an unknown figure as he looks to create a
wormhole to facilitate his escape.
He manages
to make it back to the present day, injured and with his ship damaged. And
where does he manage to wind up? His childhood home, which is simultaneously intentional
and accidental. You see he was trying to get back to 2018 but the harrowing
escape threw off his journey. The first person he sees in 2022 is himself…at 12
years old.
Reynolds
plays the tall, buff leading man of course. The younger version of Adam (Walker
Scobell) is quite the contrast. He is undersized for his age, asthmatic, and
bullied relentlessly. But he has that sarcastic sense of humor that is typical
of so many Ryan Reynolds characters.
One
remarkable aspect to this film is Walker Scobell being cast perfectly. We see a
budding star here. He is every bit as irreverent and sarcastic as the older
version of his character. The scenes between Scobell and Reynolds are done so
well and the two actors have great chemistry together.
We learn
that it’s been about 18 months since young Adam lost his father (Mark Ruffalo).
He and his mother (Jennifer Garner) are still coping with the unexpected loss.
So when the older version of himself shows up, he has a lot of questions. Older
Adam is suffering a loss himself, that being his wife Laura (Zoe Saldana).
Apparently, she traveled back to 2018 for reasons unknown to him and died upon
her return (no spoilers here, I swear). His personal mission is to discover
what. But he must wait for his ship to repair itself (they apparently can heal
on their own, like organisms) while he heals from his injuries before he can
continue.
There isn’t
much here that defies convention. So, as you might expect, there is that
villain lurking in the background. At the very beginning of the film, we learn older
Adam was escaping from Maya Sorien (Catherine Keener), an uber-powerful
oligarch whose company funded the research into time travel. Seems as though
she did so for reasons other than benevolence (hint: it may have to do with
altering the past). Oh, and Adam’s father not only discovered time travel, he and
Sorien paved the way for doing so routinely.
And as with
other films that deal with the fantasy of time travel, you have all sorts of
warnings about going into the past to alter the future and not coming in
contact with yourself. In that respect, you might expect this to be your
run-of-the-mill action flick.
But it’s
that Ryan Reynolds humor that keeps reeling you in whenever you might start to
lose interest. There are some really laugh-out-loud moments from Reynolds
himself and Scobell. Scobell matches Reynolds line for hysterical line
throughout. The kid is talented, there is no question about that, and I am
eager to see more out of him.
But there
are some very sweet moments – genuinely sweet and warm. There is a scene in a bar
where Older Adam runs into his mother and overhears her lamenting to the
bartender about the difficulty of raising her son alone. And without revealing
who he is, Adam pours his heart out under the guise giving her advice. He and
Garner play the scene perfectly.
The goal
here for Older Adam is to do away with time travel altogether. He didn’t really
want to team up with his younger self but he doesn’t really have a choice. This
mission could mean disastrous consequences for him. But he is convinced that doing
so is for the betterment of humanity. Whether he is able to do it is the
question.
Which brings
me to my earlier point about the good and bad of this film being typical
Reynolds schtick. We know he isn’t a one-trick pony. In the past Reynolds has
done well in dramatic roles, such as in the films “Life” and “Fireflies in the
Garden.” We get it. He can do the smart-ass characters without breaking a
sweat. Now I’d like to see him do more – really challenge himself and his
ability. If you look at Ryan Gosling’s CV, it’s hard to find two roles of his
that are alike. Now I’d like to see Reynolds challenge himself in the same way
because I think the talent is there.
This is a
good film. It isn’t great art of course. But as we enter a third year of the
Covid pandemic and as war in Ukraine threatens to expand, this is the kind of
film that is a terrific temporary escape.
Blatantly Obvious Movie Convention – I am going outside the convention of film
reviews with a bit of an addendum here. I have a film question that has
bothered me for decades – literally. You, too, have seen this any number of
times. Scenario: One person is set to fight a group. Why does that group always
attack one at a time? And before you yell at me, I know. If they were to all
attack at once and overwhelm the good guy/woman, there might not be reason to
continue to film. But there are smart filmmakers out there and I find it hard
to believe that nobody has found a solution. Got any ideas? Share them.
Comments
Post a Comment