Skip to main content

Great Films of the 21st Century: Adaptation (2003)


You all may not be ready to head to the movie theaters to see the latest releases. This series, "Great Films of the 21st Century" is a chance to catch up on great films of the recent past on whichever streaming service you're using. I hope soon it will be safe for all of us cinephiles to get back to the theaters. 

Adaptation

Four stars

Director: Spike Jonze

Stars: Meryl Streep, Nicolas Cage, Chris Cooper, Tilda Swinton

Rated: R

Mixing film genres and subgenres more often than not comes across forced and artificial.

Director Spike Jonze and screenwriter Charlie Kaufman, though, are uncommon with an uncommon film here. Their collaboration, "Adaptation," is just such an amalgam. But it is an engrossing, engaging film done with consummate skill and purpose. 

Though it borrows bits for its mosaic, it is startlingly creative. Kaufman and Jonze piece together biography, Hollywood satire, comedy, romance, drama of self-actualization and a thriller with an overarching theme that seamlessly brings the disparate parts together.

We are dealing with crafty, creative filmmakers here.

"He's really (expletive) good at structure," says one character about a filmmaker in the plot. That character may as well have been talking about Kaufman and Jonze themselves. 

Kaufman, ironically, is a character in the film. As with his previous film, "Being John Malkovich," he plays with the fiction/reality boundaries by writing real people into the fictional script. He does it so well, we're not quite sure of the difference. 

It starts with Kaufman (Nicolas Cage), who is struggling to adapt Susan Orlean's book "The Orchid Thief" for the screen. Cage portrays Kaufman as an awkward, balding, overweight bundle of nerves, full of self-doubt and self-loathing because of his shortcomings. His perceived failure is exacerbated by the impossibly lofty artistic goals he's set for himself. He has writer's block and can't find a way out of it.

While he re-reads Orlean's book to get a better feel for it, the parallel subplot comes into view, focusing on Orlean (Meryl Streep) as she researches her book's subject, Floridian orchid thief John LaRoche (Chris Cooper). 

Orlean covers her subject dispassionately. It's easy in this case because she's educated and LaRoche comes across as a backwards, no-tooth hillbilly. 

But as she delves deeper into his mission of finding the elusive ghost orchid, Orlean realizes LaRoche is quite intelligent and passionate, the latter quality she recognizes she is lacking. 

That may be a rather straightforward summary, but the film is anything but. Jonze and Kaufman manage to move from one comic interlude to another with such ease; from the beginning of time to Darwin's writing of the "Origin of Species," to a hysterically funny moment between Kaufman and his agent. 

The common thread is the film's title.

Kaufman must not only adapt the book to the screen, he must adapt better to his surroundings. He is helped along by his twin brother, Donald (also played by Cage), who blithely decided he wanted to be a screenwriter too. 

He bangs out a script about a serial killer, with multiple personalities, in no time at all, with the help of the screenwriting guru Brian McKee (Brian Cox). And yes, McKee is a real person and a real teacher of screenwriting. 

Donald's writing is the epitome of Hollywood convention - the anti-Charlie but with a gregarious personality. Since Donald's screenplay is an immediate success, Charlie reluctantly decided to seek McKee's help.

Orlean does her own bit of adaptation by following LaRoche further on his quest, long after her original article on him is written.

She admires his passion and longs to experience something like it. She adapts from the sophisticated New Yorker to a swamp rat to achieve fulfillment. 

At this point, the plots converge and the audience realizes how unpredictable the film has been. Just when we think we have a handle on things, we're surprised again. And the surprise isn't just for its own sake. Again, we are dealing with filmmakers who are pretty good at structure; it's just that we generally don't know what that structure is as we watch. 

As each surprise is revealed, we learn that it had its genesis earlier in the film. 

There is a wonderful sense of balance to everything, which is revealed in each character's dualistic nature (Donald might be considered Charlie's alter ego because the real Charlie Kaufman doesn't have a twin brother). 

At times the movie allows the beauty of Orlean's writing to come out while in the next frame comes a caustically funny joke. For example, we can see LaRoche is a gifted botanist but he says he's really going to make a ton of money with that "Internet thing" and launch a porn site. 

Those who say "Being John Malkovich" might have an idea of what to expect here. But few others will. Any time Jonze and Kaufman team up, I will certainly line up to see it.   

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The dystopian genre gets a shot in the arm

  Blade Runner 2049 2017 Four stars Director: Denis Villeneuve Stars: Ryan Gosling, Harrison Ford, Jared Leto, Sylvia Hoeks, Robin Wright. Runtime: 2hrs 44 mins We know that dystopian cinema includes fascinating works of art. Films like “Brazil,” “A Clockwork Orange,” and “Moon” aren’t just some of the best of the genre, they are some of the best regardless. But does their premise make them fundamentally incapable of being beautiful in every sense? Can something so ostensibly bleak, dark and pessimistic also be alluring and elegant? Unequivocally, yes. And you can add “Blade Runner 2049” to the mix. Director Denis Villeneuve takes us to Los Angeles 32 years in the future (from the release of the film). The planet is vastly overpopulated, ecosystems have collapsed, and famine is widespread until an industrialist named Niander Wallace (Jared Leto) invents synthetic farming. In the original “Blade Runner,” synthetic humans known as replicants were engineered with superior strength and...

Don't Look Up -- The Wrong Guy for the Job

Don’t Look Up Two stars Director: Adam McKay Stars: Leonardo DiCaprio, Jennifer Lawrence, Meryl Streep, Jonah Hill, Rob Morgan, Mark Rylance, Timothée Chalamet, Tyler Perry, Cate Blanchett, Ariana Grande. I can’t say that I’ve been a big fan of Adam McKay. He’s made his career as a comedy writer/director/producer and worked on Saturday Night Live before making the switch to feature films. Some of his comedies are pretty good, such as “Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy,” “The Other Guys,” “Step Brothers,” and “Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby.” He seemed to carve out a nice niche for himself. But in 2015 his career took a turn and his films moved into the political sphere. First, he adapted the Michael Lewis book, “The Big Short” into a feature film. The film chronicled the events that led to the housing market crash in 2008. Then in 2018, he directed the Dich Cheney biopic “Vice,” which netted him a fair amount of critical acclaim. And now with “Don’t Look Up,”...

Could stand more "Wonder" here

  Wonder Woman 1984 Two stars Director: Patty Jenkins      Stars: Gal Gadot, Chris Pine, Pedro Pascal, Kristen Wiig, Robin Wright, Connie Nielsen Running time: 2hr 31min For a long time I have been behind giving female characters in the superhero genre of movies more of the spotlight. I have wanted to see male characters step back, relegated to second-tier status, and let their female counterparts shine. We have seen this more and more. Not only has Wonder Woman had two feature films, we have seen characters like that of Regina King in “Watchmen” take center stage and Scarlett Johansson’s Marvel character “Black Widow” will get her own film in 2021. Women are getting greater attention in this genre, as it should be. What is particularly distressing is when a script subtly, but significantly, undercuts this progress, which is the case with “Wonder Woman 1984.” It gives the impression that the wheels of equality in Hollywood are turning more slowly t...